PIKA is a hardware performance monitoring stack to identify inefficient HPC jobs. Users of ZIH systems have the possibility to visualize and analyze the efficiency of their jobs via the PIKA web interface.
To understand this small guide, it is recommended to open the web interface in a separate window. Furthermore, at least one real HPC job should have been submitted.
PIKA consists of several components and tools. It uses the collection daemon collectd, InfluxDB to store time-series data and MariaDB to store job metadata. Furthermore, it provides a powerful web interface for the visualization and analysis of job performance data.
Table View and Job Search¶
The analysis of HPC jobs in PIKA is designed as a top-down approach. Starting from the table view, users can either analyze running or completed jobs. They can navigate from groups of jobs with the same name to the metadata of an individual job and finally investigate the job’s runtime metrics in a timeline view.
To find jobs with specific properties, the table can be sorted by any column, e.g., by consumed CPU hours to find jobs where an optimization has a large impact on the system utilization. Additionally, there is a filter mask to find jobs that match several properties. When a job has been selected, the timeline view opens.
PIKA provides timeline charts to visualize the resource utilization of a job over time. After a job is completed, timeline charts can help to identify periods of inefficient resource usage. However, they are also suitable for the live assessment of performance during the job’s runtime. In case of unexpected performance behavior, users can cancel the job, thus avoiding long execution with subpar performance.
PIKA provides the following runtime metrics:
|CPU Usage||CPU core|
|IPC (instructions per cycle)||CPU core|
|FLOPS (normalized to single precision)||CPU core|
|Main Memory Bandwidth||CPU socket|
|CPU Power||CPU socket|
|Main Memory Utilization||node|
|I/O Bandwidth (local, Lustre)||node|
|I/O Metadata (local, Lustre)||node|
|GPU Usage||GPU device|
|GPU Memory Utilization||GPU device|
|GPU Power Consumption||GPU device|
|GPU Temperature||GPU device|
Each monitored metric is represented by a timeline, whereby metrics with the same unit and data source are displayed in a common chart, e.g., different Lustre metadata operations. Each metric is measured with a certain granularity concerning the hardware, e.g. per hardware thread, per CPU socket or per node.
Be aware that CPU socket or node metrics can share the resources of other jobs running on the same CPU socket or node. This can result e.g., in cache perturbation and thus a sub-optimal performance. To get valid performance data for those metrics, it is recommended to submit an exclusive job!
To reduce the amount of recorded data, PIKA summarizes per hardware thread metrics to the corresponding physical core. In terms of simultaneous multithreading (SMT), PIKA only provides performance data per physical core.
The following table explains different timeline visualization modes. By default, each timeline shows the average value over all hardware units (HUs) per measured interval.
|Maximum||maximal value across all HUs per measured interval|
|Mean||mean value across all HUs per measured interval|
|Minimum||minimal value across all HUs per measured interval|
|Mean + Standard Deviation||mean value across all HUs including standard deviation per measured interval|
|Best||best average HU over time|
|Lowest||lowest average HU over time|
The visualization modes Maximum, Mean, and Minimum reveal the range in the utilization of individual HUs per measured interval. A high deviation of the extrema from the mean value is a reason for further investigation, since not all HUs are equally utilized.
To identify imbalances between HUs over time, the visualization modes Best and Lowest are a first indicator how much the HUs differ in terms of resource usage. The timelines Best and Lowest show the recorded performance data of the best/lowest average HU over time.
Complementary to the timeline visualization of one specific job, statistics on metadata and footprints over multiple jobs or a group of jobs with the same name can be displayed with the footprint view. The performance footprint is a set of summarized run-time metrics that is generated from the time series data for each job. To limit the jobs displayed, a time period can be specified.
To analyze the footprints of a larger number of jobs, a visualization with histograms and scatter plots can be used. PIKA uses histograms to illustrate the number of jobs that fit into a category or bin. For job states and job tags there is a fixed number of categories or values. For other footprint metrics PIKA uses a binning with a user-configurable bin size, since the value range usually contains an unlimited number of values. A scatter plot enables the combined view of two footprint metrics (except for job states and job tags), which is particularly useful for investigating their correlation.
If users wish to perform their own measurement of performance counters using performance tools other than PIKA, it is recommended to disable PIKA monitoring. This can be done using the following Slurm flags in the job script:
#SBATCH --exclusive #SBATCH --comment=no_monitoring
Note: Disabling PIKA monitoring is possible only for exclusive jobs!
The PIKA metric FLOPS is not supported by the Intel Haswell cpu architecture.
However, PIKA provides this metric to show the computational intensity.
Do not rely on FLOPS on Haswell! We use the event
AVX_INSTS_CALC which counts the